It then applies this framework to examine and compare campaigns for reserved seats in Pakistan and India, party quotas in Sweden and the United Kingdom, and legislative quotas in Argentina and France. version) that five Al Masry Al Youm reporters, in addition to ten working. First, why are quotas adopted? Which actors are involved in quota campaigns, and why do they support or oppose quota measures? Second, what effects do quotas have on existing patterns of political representation? Are these provisions sufficient for bringing more women into politics? Or, does their impact depend on other features of the broader political context? Synthesizing literature on quota policies, this book develops a framework for analyzing the spread of quota provisions and the reasons for variations in their effects. ticularly the Internet, the link between social media and political activism. It is organized around two sets of questions. Quotas for Women in Politics is the first book to address quotas as a global phenomenon to explain their spread and impact in diverse contexts around the world. Consequently, explanations for the adoption and impact of gender quotas derived from one study often contradict with findings from other cases. considering the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist group, ElMasry Elyoum, December 25, 2013. Difficulty accessing Al-Masry Al-Youm newspaper online raises questions. Despite the rapid international diffusion of these measures, most research has focused on single countries - or, at most, the presence of quotas within one world region. Ahram Online, June 21, 2013, accessed October 12, 2017. BirdLifes online World Bird Database: the site for bird conservation. Al-Masry Al-Youm chief editor, journalists released after questioning over. In recent years, political parties and national legislatures in more than one hundred countries have adopted quotas for the selection of female candidates to political office. Young cartoonist, Andeel, left his job at al-Masry al-Youm, Egypts most. While finding that the rationale of humanitarianism generally played well for the coalition during this study period, this article explores the problematic nature of the narrative of liberation. A lot of political organization and protests were detailed online in the years. Privileging visual content in research design, the study presents selected results from a comprehensive content and framing analysis of press photography during the invasion period (March–April 2003), specifically examining the prominence and treatment of photographs in the humanitarian-related visual coverage, along with the accompanying words used to define, support or detract from the events depicted. This article assesses the role played by press photography in legitimizing or challenging this crucial framing during the invasion across a range of UK national newspapers. Although the 2003 Iraq invasion was not wholly framed as a ‘humanitarian intervention’, the rhetoric of bringing liberation, democratization and human rights to the Iraqi people was widely advanced by the coalition and supporters as a legitimating reason for war.
0 kommentar(er)
